<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The \u20ac3 EU customs duty sounds too small to plan around. It is not, for two reasons most coverage skips: it is charged per customs declaration line rather than per parcel, and it is not refunded when the order comes back. For brands shipping low-value, multi-item orders into the EU from outside it, those two details decide whether a range is still profitable.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The EU removed the \u20ac150 customs duty exemption for low-value imports. Goods valued at \u20ac150 or less previously entered free of customs duty, though import VAT applied from the first euro. In its place, qualifying B2C shipments of \u20ac150 or less now carry a temporary \u20ac3 duty. Three dates matter:<\/p>\n\n\n\n
<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The duty applies across all 27 EU member states, and it does not replace VAT. Import VAT still applies under existing rules, with the duty sitting on top. For the wider picture, see our European supply chain update<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n <\/p>\n\n\n\n This is the detail that changes the maths, and most summaries get it loose. The duty is charged per customs declaration line \u2014 generally each unique HS code and, where applicable, country of origin in the shipment. It is not a single flat charge applied once to the parcel.<\/p>\n\n\n\n <\/p>\n\n\n\n A customer ordering one T-shirt pays one charge. A customer ordering a T-shirt, a pair of socks and a cap \u2014 three different product types, three different HS codes \u2014 generates three declaration lines on the same parcel.<\/p>\n\n\n\n <\/p>\n\n\n\n That inverts the usual advice. Encouraging larger baskets normally improves your shipping economics, because one parcel carries more revenue. Under this rule, a larger basket made of more product types can increase the duty rather than dilute it.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Customs duty paid on an outbound shipment may not be automatically refunded if the goods come back.<\/p>\n\n\n\n For most categories that is an irritation. For fashion<\/a>, footwear and consumer electronics \u2014 where return rates run from a quarter to a third of orders \u2014 it is a structural cost. You pay on every order that goes out and do not get it back on the ones that return.<\/p>\n\n\n\n <\/p>\n\n\n\n Run it against a realistic mix. A fashion brand shipping 1,000 low-value orders a month into the EU, averaging two product types per order, pays duty on 2,000 declaration lines. At a 30% return rate, roughly 600 of those lines generated no revenue at all and the duty on them is likely unrecoverable.<\/p>\n\n\n\n <\/p>\n\n\n\n That is before the VAT effect, before any carrier clearance fee, and before the handling fee<\/a> expected from November.<\/p>\n\n\n\n A flat charge is regressive, so the damage concentrates in a predictable place.<\/p>\n\n\n\n <\/p>\n\n\n\n The duty applies to goods entering the EU. An order shipped from stock already held inside the EU customs union is a domestic movement between member states \u2014 no customs entry, no declaration lines, no duty.<\/p>\n\n\n\n <\/p>\n\n\n\n So the same \u20ac40 three-item order to a German customer behaves in two different ways:<\/p>\n\n\n\n <\/p>\n\n\n\n Most advice on this change is about paying the duty more smoothly: display it at checkout, ship Delivered Duty Paid, keep HS codes clean. All sensible, and still necessary for volume you genuinely must import. But for a brand selling steady volume into Europe, the larger decision is where the stock sits in the first place.<\/p>\n\n\n\n <\/p>\n\n\n\n Efulfilment Europe dispatches from Almere in the Netherlands. Stock held there is already inside the EU customs union, so orders to EU member states move as domestic shipments rather than imports.<\/p>\n\n\n\n <\/p>\n\n\n\nWhy “\u20ac3 per parcel” is the wrong way to model it<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
The returns problem nobody is pricing in<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
Which orders this actually hurts<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
\n
The distinction that decides whether you pay it at all<\/a><\/h2>\n\n\n\n
\n